Real Talk: Imma bout five minutes away from puttin this nursing home drama on complete and total blast 😈
Real Talk: The nursing home was first asked to let the resident out for doctor and dental appointments, then a holiday, but said no to those requests. The nursing home was then asked to transfer/ refer the resident to another facility, but refused to do so, opting instead to keep the dolla's, and gain control of the resident through the guardianship system. After all this time however, and the residents years of torture and abuse by and at the nursing home, the only reason the nursing home wants to control the resident, is because the resident has newly discovered assets, including a house in the suburbs. That said, the resident (as a surviving spouse), attempted to transfer the house via an Application for Certificate of Transfer. Despite that the application should have been granted within 72 hours after it was filed, it was, instead, set for hearing on a date that was some 3-4 weeks from the date of filing, and ultimately denied. Moreover, an attorney appeared at the hearing and, absent an attorney client relationship with the applicant, nevertheless influenced the outcome of the proceeding. Simply, the court denied the application on grounds that the applicant is in a nursing home. That the applicant is in a nursing home however, does not preclude the applicant from owning real estate, so the court can not deny the application on that basis. Furthermore, the court can not permit the outcome of a proceeding to be determined by an attorney who has no attorney/client relationship with the applicant, so the court erred when it permitted the attorney to appear on applicants behalf.
In any case, at this point, it appears that the court, the attorney, and the nursing home, have colluded to prevent the transfer of the property to its rightful owner: the surviving spouse.
But why?
I'm not sure, but word on the street is that the house has been ear marked for drug trafficking , and, as such, was not to transfer to , or be occupied by, the surviving spouse, but instead, transferred to an llc that would be expressly set up to house 'black urban professional dope boys,' and/or otherwise advance the drug trade. The implication of course being, that the court already knew the house had been earmarked for drug trafficking, and was therefore in place to insure that the processing of the application for certificate of transfer was unnecessarily delayed , while the attorney was in place to insure that the application for certificate of transfer was ultimately denied.
But I don't know.
What I DO know however, is that the Application for Certificate of Transfer should have been granted within 72 hours of filing, rather than set for a hearing 3-4 weeks out, and denied. I also know that, either the attorney was watching the docket in anticipation of the filing of the application for certificate of transfer, or someone in the court tipped the attorney off to the fact that it had been filed, because the attorney would not otherwise have known the application was filed and/or that a hearing had been set. Finally, and again, absent an attorney /client relationship with the applicant, the court erred when it allowed an attorney to appear on the applicants behalf, and/or otherwise influence the outcome of the proceeding, because the attorney had no standing to do so. And THAT... is just on periodt.
update: My five bucks says the case was rigged or fixed. Same difference
As